Brazilian Journal of Respiratory, Cardiovascular and Critical Care Physiotherapy
https://bjr-assobrafir.org/article/5dd53d220e8825e43dc8fca6
Brazilian Journal of Respiratory, Cardiovascular and Critical Care Physiotherapy
Artigo Original

Conhecimento sobre doença arterial coronariana e barreiras para adesão à reabilitação cardíaca

Knowledge about coronary artery disease and barriers to attending cardiac rehabilitation

Sabrina Costa Lima, Natália Freitas de Oliveira, Dayane Montemezzo, Gabriela Suéllen da Silva Chaves, Thaianne Cavalcante Sérvio, Raquel Rodrigues Britto

Downloads: 14
Views: 1376

Resumo

Introdução: A Reabilitação Cardíaca (RC) contempla um programa estruturado de exercícios físicos, formação educacional integral e aconselhamento, visando otimizar a funcionalidade dos pacientes com doenças cardiovasculares. Objetivo: Avaliar o nível de conhecimento sobre a Doença Arterial Coronariana (DAC), de acordo com a escolaridade e a percepção em relação às barreiras que afetam a participação e adesão dos usuários atendidos por um programa de RC. Metodologia: Estudo transversal realizado por meio da aplicação do Questionário de Educação de DAC (CADE-Q), a fim de avaliar o nível de conhecimento sobre temas relacionados à DAC, e da Escala de Barreiras para RC (EBRC) a qual permite avaliar a percepção dos usuários dos programas de RC, em relação às barreiras que influenciam na sua adesão e participação. Resultados: Trinta usuários com média de idade de 63±11anos foram avaliados. O CADE-Q revelou que participantes com escolaridade acima do ensino médio completo apresentaram 37 pontos de escore total médio do conhecimento (34,00 - 43,50) e os usuários com escolaridade abaixo do ensino médio completo 27,50 pontos (18,75-33,50); p=0,004. Na EBRC, os usuários apresentaram pontuação média de 64,07±1,43 (61% do total) e as principais barreiras identificadas foram relacionadas à família, ao estado de saúde dos próprios pacientes e às dificuldades com transporte. Conclusão: Usuários com maior nível de escolaridade (acima do ensino médio completo) apresentaram melhor conhecimento sobre a DAC. Além disso, barreiras relacionadas à família, estado de saúde dos mesmos e dificuldades com transporte foram identificadas como fatores que influenciam na adesão e participação no programa de RC.

Palavras-chave

Doença arterial coronariana; Conhecimento; Barreiras; Questionários; Reabilitação.

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) comprises a program of structured exercise, comprehensive education and counseling to optimize functionality of patients with cardiovascular disease. Objective: To assess the level of knowledge about Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) according to education level, and the perception of barriers which affect participation and adherence of users assisted by a CR program. Methodology: A Cross-sectional study was carried out with the application of CAD Education Questionnaire (CADE-Q) in order to evaluate the level of knowledge on issues related to CAD. The CR Barriers Scale (CRBS) which allows assessing the perception of CR programs users regarding barriers that influence their participation and adherence was also applied. Results: Thirty users, mean age of 63±11 years, were evaluated. CADE-Q revealed that participants with education level higher than high school degree presented 37 points (34.00- 43.50) as mean score of total knowledge and users with education level below high school degree presented 27.50 points (18.75-33.50); p=0.004. Regarding CRBS, users presented mean score of 64.07±1.43 (61% of total) and the main barriers identified were related to family, health status and difficulties with transportation. Conclusion: Users with higher education levels (above high school degree) presented better knowledge about CAD. Furthermore, barriers related to family, health status and difficulties with transportation were identified as factors that influence adherence and participation in a CR program.

Keywords

Coronary artery disease; Education; Knowledge; Questionnaires; Rehabilitation.

References

1. Cardiac Care Network. The Ontario cardiac rehabilitation pilot project: Report and recommendations. 2002.

2. World Health Organization (WHO). Cardiovascular disease fact sheet. 2011;317.

3. Mansur AP, Favarato D, Souza MF, Avakian SD, Aldrighi JM, César LA et al. Tendência do risco de morte por doenças circulatórias no Brasil de 1979 a 1996. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2001;76(6):497-503.

4. Souza MFM, Timerman A, Serrano Jr CV, Santos RD, Mansur AP. Tendências do risco de morte por doenças circulatórias nas cinco regiões do Brasil no período de 1979 a 1996. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2001;77(6):562-8.

5. Taylor RS, Brown A, Ebrahim S, Jolliffe J, Noorani H, Rees K, et al. Exercise- based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Med. 2004 May 15;116(10):682-92.

6. Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia. Diretriz de reabilitação cardiopulmonar e metabólica: aspectos práticos e responsabilidades. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2006 Jan;86(1):74-82.

7. Hirani SP, Patterson DLH, Newman SP. What do coronary artery disease patients think about their treatments? An assessment of patients’ treatment representations. J Health Psychol. 2008 Apr;13(3):311-22.

8. The British Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (BACPR). The BACPR standards and core components for cardiovascular disease prevention and rehabilitation. 2nd ed. 2012.

9. Ades PA, Waldmann ML, McCann WJ, Weaver SO. Predictors of cardiac rehabilitation participation in older coronary patients. Arch Intern Med. 1992 May;152(5):1033-5.

10. Ghisi GLM, Santos RZ, Felipe TR, Knackfuss MI, Benetti M Avaliação do conhecimento do paciente em programas de reabilitação cardíaca no Nordeste e Sul do Brasil. ConScientiae Saúde. 2013;12(4):611-620.

11. McAlister FA, Lawson FME, Teo KK, Armstrong PW. Randomised trials of secondary prevention programs in coronary heart disease: systematic review. BMJ. 2001 Oct 27;323(7319):957-962.

12. Galdeano LE, Rossi LA, Spadoti Dantas RA. Deficient knowledge nursing diagnosis: identifying the learning needs of patients with cardiac disease. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2010 Jul-Sep;21(3):100-7.

13. Ghisi GL, Durieux A, Manfroi WC, Herdy AH, Carvalho Td, Andrade A, Benetti M. Construction and validation of the CADE-Q for patient education in cardiac rehabilitation programs. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2010 Jun;94(6): 813-22.

14. Guillemin F. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of health status measures. Scand J Rheumatol. 1995;24(2):61-3.

15. Sommaruga M, Vidotto G, Bertolotti G, Pedretti RF, Tramarin R. A self administered tool for the evaluation of the efficacy of health educational interventions in cardiac patients. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2003 Mar;60(1):7-15.

16. Yehle KS, Sands LP, Rhynders PA, Newton GD. The effect of shared medical visits on knowledge and self-care in patients with heart failure: a pilot study. Heart Lung. 2009 Jan-Feb;38(1):25-33.

17. Ghisi GL, Santos RZ, Schveitzer V, Barros AL, Recchia TL, Oh P, et al. Development and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012 Apr;98(4):344-51.

18. Barros AL, Santos RZ, Bonin CDB, Ghisi GLM, Grace S, Benetti M. Diferentes barreiras para reabilitação cardíaca. Rev Bras Cardiol. 2014 Jul-Ago;27(4):293-8.

19. Borghi-Silva A, Mendes RG , Trimer R, Cipriano JR G. Current trends in reducing CVD risk factors from around the world: focus on cardiac rehabilitation in Brazil. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2014 Mar-Apr;56(5):536-42.

20. Ghisi GL, Abdallah F, Grace SL, Thomas S, Oh P. A systematic review of patient education in cardiac patients: Do they increase knowledge and promote health behavior change?. Patient Educ Counseling. 2014 May;95(2):160-174.

21. Assiri AS. Knowledge about coronary artery disease among patients admitted to Aseer Central Hospital with acute coronary syndrome. West Afr J Med. 2003 Dec;22(4):314-7.

22. Witt BJ, Jacobsen SJ, Weston SA, Killian JM, Meverden RA, Allison TG, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction in the community. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Sep 1;44:988-96.

5dd53d220e8825e43dc8fca6 1571231544 Articles
Links & Downloads

BJR

Share this page
Page Sections