Brazilian Journal of Respiratory, Cardiovascular and Critical Care Physiotherapy
https://bjr-assobrafir.org/article/5de013610e882598354ce1d5
Brazilian Journal of Respiratory, Cardiovascular and Critical Care Physiotherapy
Artigo de Revisão

Repercussões da sedação em pacientes internados em unidades de terapia intensiva: uma revisão sistemática

Repercussions of sedation in hospitalized patients in intensive care units: a systematic review

Priscylla de Azevedo Silva Basto, Yasmin de Oliveira Soares, Hudhane Santos de Oliveira, Willian de Souza Gonçalves, Luciana Fernandes Balestra, Giulliano Gardenghi

Downloads: 36
Views: 3465

Resumo

Introdução: A sedação é um ato médico realizado, mediante utilização de medicamentos, com o objetivo de proporcionar conforto ao paciente. A maioria dos pacientes internados em Unidades de Terapia Intensiva (UTI) necessita de sedação, em algum momento durante sua internação, principalmente, quando submetidos à intubação orotraqueal e, consequentemente, à ventilação mecânica. Objetivo: O presente estudo trata de uma revisão sistemática e tem por objetivo verificar a aplicabilidade e as repercussões das técnicas de sedação e de seu respectivo desmame, analisando seus efeitos em pacientes sob ventilação mecânica em UTI. Métodos: Foi realizada uma revisão sistemática de estudos publicados entre os anos de 1993 a 2013, utilizando as bases de dados PubMed, Scielo e Google Acadêmico, empregando, como palavras chave, sedação, ventilação mecânica, unidades de terapia intensiva e agitação. Resultados: Observou-se que, na maioria dos casos em que o paciente necessitou de prótese endotraqueal, o tempo de sedação foi primordial para determinar o tempo de permanência do tubo. Protocolos que realizaram suspensão diária da sedação, em sua maioria, foram mais eficazes em proporcionar a extubação precoce dos indivíduos ventilados, quando comparados a outras formas de administração da sedação. A sedação do paciente utilizando propofol ou dexmedetomidina parece encurtar o tempo de ventilação mecânica, quando comparada com outros sedativos. Maior permanência em UTI, sob ventilação mecânica e sob efeito de sedação, foi relacionada com maiores complicações. Conclusão: O uso prolongado de sedação foi relacionado a eventos adversos, como aumento nos tempos de ventilação mecânica e de internação, maiores custos e maior incidência de degeneração muscular e cutânea, além de maiores taxas de mortalidade, entre outros.

Palavras-chave

Sedação; Unidades de terapia intensiva; Ventilação mecânica; Agitação

Abstract

Introduction: Sedation is a medical act performed by the use of drugs aiming to provide comfort to the patient. Most of the intubated patients in intensive care units (ICU) will receive some sort of sedation during their hospital length of stay, especially when submitted to orotracheal intubation and consequently, to mechanical ventilation. Objetive: The present study is a systematic review and aims to report on the use and the repercussions of several sedation techniques and also report on their weaning, analyzing its effects in patients who underwent mechanical ventilation in ICU. Methods: A systematic review of studies published from 1993 to 2013 was conducted, searching the following databases: PubMed, Scielo and Academic Google and using as keywords sedation, mechanical ventilation, intensive care units and agitation. Results: In most of the cases when the patient required endotracheal tubes, the duration of sedation was essential to determine the chest tube duration. Many protocols performed daily suspension of sedation and these were more effective in order to promote the extubation of patients, when compared with other forms of sedation administering. The use of sedatives as propofol and dexmedetomidine seems to shorten the length of mechanical ventilation, when compared with other drugs. Longer permanence in ICU under mechanical ventilation and under sedation effects was related to major complications. Conclusion: Prolonged use of sedation was related to adverse events such as the increased time under mechanical ventilation, increased hospital length of stay, increased costs, higher degeneration of muscular and skin tissues as well as higher mortality rates, among others complications.

Keywords

Sedation; Intensive care units; Mechanical ventilation; Agitation

Referências

1. Conselho Federal de Medicina. Resolução CFM nº 1.670/03 [online, citado 2013 out 17]. Disponível em: http://www.portalmedico.org.br/resolucoes/CFM/2003/1670_2003.html.

2. Carrasco G, Molina R, Costa J, Soler JM, Cabre L. Propofol versus midazolam in short medium and long-term sedation of critically ill patients. A cost-benefit analysis.Chest. 1993;103(2):557-64.

3. Kollef MH, Horst HM, Prang L, Brock WA. Reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation: three examples of change in the intensive care unit.New Horiz. 1998;6(1):52-60.

4. Kollef MH, Levy NT, Ahrens TS, Schaiff R, Prentice D, Sherman G. The use of continuous i.v. sedation is associated with prolongation of mechanical ventilation. Chest. 1998;114(2):541-8.

5. Jung YJ, Chung WY, Lee M, Lee KS, Park JH, Sheen SS et al.The significance of sedation control in patients receiving mechanical ventilation.Tuberc Respir Dis. 2012;73(3):151-61.

6. Amaral JLG, Resque AP, Guimarães HP, Capone Neto A, Machado FS, Moritz R. Analgesia e sedação em sepse [Sedation and analgesia]. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2004;16(3):182-7. Portuguese.

7. Silva E, Pedro Mde A, Sogayar AC, Mohovic T, Silva CL, Janiszewski Met al. Brazilian sepsis epidemiological study. Crit Care. 2004 Aug;8(4):R251-60.

8. Jackson DL, Proudfoot CW, Cann KF, Walsh T. A systematic review of the impact of sedation practice in the ICU on resource use, costs and patient safety. Crit Care. 2010;14(2):R59.

9. Zanon F, Caovilla JJ, Michel RS, Cabeda EV, Ceretta DF, Luckemeyer GD et al. Sepse na unidade de terapia intensiva: etiologias, fatores prognósticos e mortalidade. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2008 AbrJun, 20(2):128-34

10. Sossdorf M, Otto GP, Menge K, Claus RA, Losche W, Kabisch B et al. Potential effect of physiotherapeutic treatment on mortality rate in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: A retrospective cohort analysis. J Crit Care. 2013 Dec;28(6):954-8.

11. Kress JP, Pohlman AS, O’Connor MF, Hall JB. Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.N Engl J Med. 2000 May 18;342(20):1471-7.

12. Trompeo AC, Vidi Y, Locane MD, Braghiroli A, Mascia L, Bosma K, Ranieri VM. Sleep disturbances in the critically ill patients: role of delirium and sedative agents. Minerva Anestesiol. 2011 Jun;77(6):604-12.

13. Ostermann ME, Keenan SP, Seiferling RA, Sibbald WJ. Sedation in the intensive care unit: a systematic review. JAMA. 2000 Mar 15;283(11):1451-9.

14. Wijeysundera DN, Naik JS, Beattie WS. Alpha-2 adrenergic agonists to prevent perioperative cardiovascular complications: a meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2003 Jun 15;114(9):742-52.

15. St André AC, Del Rossi A. Hemodynamic management of patients in the first 24 hours after cardiac surgery. Crit Care Med. 2005 Sep; 33(9):2082-93.

16. Herr DL, Sum-Ping ST, England M. ICU sedation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: dexmedetomidine-based versus propofol-based sedation regimens. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003 Oct; 17(5):576-84.

17. Curtis JA, Hollinger MK, Jain HB. Propofol-based versus dexmedetomidine-based sedation in cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013 Dec; 27(6):1289-94.

18. Rundshagen I, Schnabel K, Wegner C, amEsch S. Incidence of recall, nightmares, and hallucinations during analgosedation in intensive care. Intensive Care Med. 2002 Jan;28(1):38-43.

19. Rodrigues Junior GR, do Amaral JL. Influence of sedation on morbidity and mortality in the intensive care unit. Sao Paulo Med J. 2004 Jan 8;122(1):8-11.

20. Mantovani C, Migon MN, Alheira FV, Del-Ben CM. Manejo de paciente agitado ou agressivo [Managing agitated or aggressive patients]. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2010 Oct;32(Supl 2):96-103. Portuguese.

21. Tonner PH, Weiler N, Paris A, Scholz J. Sedation and analgesia in the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2003 Apr;16(2):113-21.

22. Machado F, Mazza B, Silva E, Salomão R, Bernardo WM. Sedação, analgesia e bloqueio neuromuscular [online]. Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira; 2011 [citado 2013 Dez 12]. Disponível em: http://www.projetodiretrizes.org.br/ans/diretrizes.

23. Sales Jr JAL, David CM, Hatum R, Souza PCSP, Japiassú A, Pinheiro CTS et al. Grupo de estudo de sepse do fundo AMIB. Sepse Brasil: estudo epidemiológico da sepse em unidades de terapia intensiva brasileiras [An epidemiological study of sepsis in Intensive Care Units: Sepsis Brazil study]. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva, 2006 Jan-Mar;18(1):9-17. Portuguese.

24. Miller DD. Atypical antipsychotics: sleep, sedation, and efficacy. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;6(Suppl 2):3-7.

25. Bensenor FEM, Cicarelli DD, Vieira JE. Sedação pós-operatória na unidade de apoio cirúrgico do hospital das clínicas de São Paulo: estudo retrospectivo [Postoperative sedation at hospital das clínicas, São Paulo, postoperative unit: a retrospective study]. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 2004 May-Jun, 54(3):391-8. Portuguese.

26. Ramsay MA, Savege TM, Simpson BR, Goodwin R. Controlled sedation with alphaxalonealphadolone. Brit Med J. 1974 Jun 22;2(5920):656-9.

27. Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, Brophy GM, O’Neal PV, Keane KA et al. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Nov 15;166(10):1338-44.

28. Mendes CL, Vasconcelos LCS, Tavares JS, Fontan SB, Ferreira DC, Diniz LAC et al. Escalas de Ramsay e Richmond são equivalentes para a avaliação do nível de sedação em pacientes gravemente enfermos [Ramsay and Richmond scores are equivalent for the assessment of sedation level in critical patients]. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2008 Oct-Dec; 20(4):344-8. Portuguese.

29. Fernandes NCS, Torres GV, Vieira D. Fatores de risco e condições predisponentes para úlcera de pressão em pacientes de terapia intensiva [Risk factors and predisposing conditions to pressure ulcers in intensive care unit patients]. Rev Elet Enferm. 2008; 10(3):733-46. Portuguese.

30. Cremasco FM, Wenzel F, Sardinha FM, Zanei SSV, Whitaker IY. Ulcera por pressão: risco e gravidade do paciente e carga de trabalho de enfermagem [Pressure ulcer: patient risk, patient acuity, and nursing workload]. Acta Paul Enferm.2009; 22(n. esp):897-902. Portuguese.

31. Kress JP, Gehlbach B, Lacy M, Pliskin N, Pohlman AS, Hall JB. The long-term psychological effects of daily sedative interruption on critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Dec 15;168(12):1457-61.

32. Nelson LE, Lu J, Guo T, Saper CB, Franks NP, Maze M. The alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine converges on an endogenous sleep-promoting pathway to exert its sedative effects. Anesthesiology. 2003 Feb;98(2):428-36.

33. Sousa Neto EG, Moraes R, Costa F, Eberhardt E, Rodrigues APO, Aquim EE. Análise entre o tempo e nível de sedação com o processo de desmame ventilatório em pacientes portadores de TCE grave e moderado [Analysis between time and level of sedation with the process weaning, in patients with severe head trauma and moderate]. Rev Inspirar. 2013 Jan-Feb; 22(5):1-5. Portuguese.

34. Kress JP, Vinayak AG, Levitt J, Schweickert WD, Gehlbach BK, Zimmerman F et al. Daily sedative interruption in mechanically ventilated patients at risk for coronary artery disease. Crit Care Med. 2007 Feb;35(2):365-71.

35. Skoglund K, Enblad P, Marklund N. Monitoring and sedation differences in the management of severe head injury and subarachnoid hemorrhage among neurocritical care centers. J Neurosci Nurs. 2013 Dec;45(6):360-8.

36. Kelly DF, Goodale DB, Williams J, Herr DL, Chappell T,Rosner MJ et al. Propofol in the treatment of moderate and severe head injury: a randomized, prospective double-blinded pilot trial. J Neurosurg. 1999 Jun; 90(6):1042-52.

37. Tobar E, Bugedo G, Andresen M, Aguirre M, Lira MT, Godoy J et al. Características e impacto de la sedación, la analgesia y el bloqueo neuromuscular enlos pacientes críticos que recibieron ventilación mecánica prolongada [Characteristics and impact of sedation, analgesia, and neuromuscular blockage in critical patients undergoing prolonged mechanical ventilation]. Med Intensiva. 2009 Oct, 33(7):311-20. Spanish.

38. Karabinis A, Mandragos K, Stergiopoulos S, Komnos A, Soukup J, Speelberg B, Kirkham AJ. Safety and efficacy of analgesia-based sedation with remifentanil versus hypnotic-based remimens in intensive care unit patients with brain injuries: a randomised, controlled trial. Crit Care. 2004 Aug; 8(4):R268-80.

39. Schramm P, Klein KU, Falkenberg L, Berres M, Closhen D, Werhahn KJ et al. Impaired cerebrovascular autoregulation in patients with severe sepsis and sepsis-associated delirium. Crit Care. 2012 Oct 4;16(5):R181.

40. Prasad SR, Simha PP, Jagadeesh AM. Comparative study between dexmedetomidine and fentanyl for sedation during mechanical ventilation in post-operative paediatric cardiac surgical patients. Indian J Anaesth. 2012 Nov,56(6):547-52.

5de013610e882598354ce1d5 1571231544 Articles
Links & Downloads

BJR

Share this page
Page Sections